Academic Programs

Undergraduate Programs

M27C

Procedures for Undergraduate Curriculum Development and Curriculum Proposals

M22R

Proposal Forms for courses, minors, and new programs may be found on the Curriculum Committee site.

The formal definition of a credit hour may be found here. Please consult it when proposing a course with a nonstandard meeting schedule and address it within your proposal.

Development of Proposal

  • The Department Chair shall involve all department members in discussions regarding curriculum proposals.
  • The Department Chair and the respective Dean of the school or college shall work in concert in the development of curriculum changes and proposals.

School or Division-Based Review

  1. Upon completion of the development process, the appropriate school or division-based curriculum committee will consider the proposal. The Department Chair, with support and documentation provided by the department and the Dean of the school or college, will attend the meeting of the appropriate curriculum committee when the proposal is discussed.
  2. Curricular changes initiated by the academic departments and in consultation with the Dean should be copied to the Dean, the chair of the appropriate school or division-based curriculum committee, and the members of the University Curriculum Committee 14 days before the scheduled committee meetings.
  3. The school or division-based committee will consider the proposal. If the proposal represents a "reportable item" (a curriculum change that does not impact any student's graduation requirements), the school or division-based committee renders a decision and informs the University Curriculum Committee of that decision. If the proposal represents a more substantive change to the curriculum, or if it impacts another department or program, the school or division-based committee considers it and forwards a recommendation to the University Curriculum Committee.
  4. Should the Department Chair, the department, and the academic Dean fail to reach consensus, the proposal bypasses the school or division-based curriculum committee and is sent directly to the University Curriculum Committee. The proposal and a written statement from the academic Dean will be considered by a conference committee consisting of the following members: the chair of the department from which the proposal originates; the appropriate academic Dean; the Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs or their representative; the Chair of the University Curriculum Committee, who will act as chair of the conference committee; and the Chair Pro Tempore of the University Curriculum Committee. The conference committee will attempt to resolve the differences between the department and the academic Dean and will offer specific recommendations regarding the proposal in that effort. The recommendations will be adopted upon a majority vote of the five members of the conference committee.
  5. Once the conference committee makes its recommendations, the department and academic Dean will work to incorporate them into the proposal. The department will then decide to forward the amended proposal or the original proposal with the conference committee recommendations to the appropriate school or division-based curriculum committee for consideration.

University Curriculum Committee Review

  1. Appropriate academic Deans and Department Chairs will be invited to Curriculum Committee meetings during which proposals from their college, schools, or departments will be discussed and will participate in the discussion of those proposals.
  2. Once a proposal has been approved by the University Curriculum Committee, it can be revised only to reflect catalog copy. The sponsoring department is responsible for submitting catalog copy to the Office of the Registrar.
  3. For inclusion in the subsequent year’s catalog, proposals should be scheduled for the agenda of the April University Curriculum Committee meeting.

Graduate Programs

M34Z

Procedures for Graduate Curriculum: Changes to Existing Programs

M24W

NOTE:  Proposers should follow the process articulated in M33T for a new graduate program that meets any of the following conditions:  (a) results in a new degree, previously not offered by the University; (b) that requires significant financial resources; (c) requires a substantive change prospectus for Southern Association for Colleges and Schools, Commission on Colleges (SACSCOC).

Proposal Forms for new courses and other curricular changes to existing programs may be found on the University Curriculum Committee site.

The formal definition of a credit hour may be found here. Please consult it when proposing a course with a nonstandard meeting schedule and address it within your proposal.

Development of Proposal

  1. Discussions regarding curriculum change proposals will involve the Department Chair, Program Director, and school/department faculty as appropriate.
  2. Development of curriculum change proposals will involve the respective Dean of the school or college, the Department Chair and/or the Program Director as appropriate; and designated faculty.

School or Division Based Review

  1. Curriculum and program proposals will be considered by a designated school- or division-based committee. The Department Chair, Program Director, or other interdisciplinary Proposer (see below), with support and documentation provided by the department faculty and the Dean of the school or college, will attend meetings when the proposal is discussed.
  2. The designated school- or division-based committee may vary (in name and composition) according to the organizational structure and size of the school, division, or department that originates the proposal. However, the committee structure and process must comply with any applicable requirements of accrediting agencies. Some examples of current models are shown below:
    • Love School of Business: The school-based curriculum committee is designated to review and approve graduate curriculum and program proposals. For proposals originating from a department, approval of the department faculty is required before review by the school-based curriculum committee.
    • Dr. Jo Watts Williams School of Education: The Teacher Education Committee is designated to review and approve graduate curriculum and program proposals. Secondary approval by the school-based curriculum committee is not required for graduate program proposals. For the M.Ed. program, the Teacher Education Committee is also required to approve any curriculum or program changes prior to the school-based curriculum committee approval.
  1. For changes to interdisciplinary graduate programs involving more than one school or division, faculty in the program will be designated to discuss and develop the proposal. The principal Proposer, generally a program Director (or equivalent title), fulfills the role of Department Chair in this process, and the Proposers' academic Dean represents the administration as the proposal moves forward for consideration. Changes to such a program should be reviewed by all relevant school or division Curriculum Committees.

Graduate Council Review

  1. On approval by the Dean and school or division-based curriculum committee (s), curriculum and program proposals will be forwarded to the Graduate Council for consideration. The proposal(s) must be submitted to the Chair of Graduate Council 14 days before the next scheduled meeting of the Graduate Council to be listed on the meeting agenda. The respective Proposer and academic Dean, will be invited to the Graduate Council meeting to discuss the proposal(s).
  2. On approval by the Graduate Council, curriculum proposals will be submitted by the sponsoring department to the Office of the Registrar and can be revised only to reflect catalog copy. 

University Curriculum Committee Review

  1. The Provost' designee on the Graduate Council serves as a liaison to the University Curriculum Committee and can, after consulting with the Chairs of Graduate Council and the University Curriculum Committee, recommend a subsequent review by the University Curriculum Committee in cases where a proposal may significantly impact the undergraduate academic program or curriculum.

Procedures for the Proposal and Review of New Graduate Programs

M33T

This section refers to the proposal of graduate programs that result in a new degree, previously not offered by the University that require significant financial resources, and/or that require a substantive change prospectus for Southern Association for Colleges and Schools, Commission on Colleges (SACSCOC). Units unsure of whether the curricular process below applies to their new proposed program should consult with the Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs who will make this determination.

The Proposal Form for new programs may be found on the Curriculum Committee site.

The formal definition of a credit hour may be found here. Please consult it when proposing a course with a nonstandard meeting schedule and address it within your proposal.

Development of a New Graduate Program Prospectus

New graduate program must be consistent with the Graduate Mission of the University and the graduate program vision.

They should originate from department-wide action or from administration in consultation with school/college and departmental leadership.

Phase 1 - New Graduate Program Prospectus

A new graduate program prospectus should include:

  • A feasibility study demonstrating the viability of the proposed program addressing enrollment demands and market area, staffing, facilities, library and other resources, budget projections, and impact on undergraduate programs
  • A statement justifying the program as related to the graduate mission statement
  • A listing of the degree(s) offered and an outline of degree requirements

The prospectus proposals for a new graduate program should be submitted to the following groups for approval in the order listed below:

  • Curriculum Committee (School or Division-Based) (Proposals involving more than one school or division should be reviewed by all relevant school-or division-based curriculum committees.)
  • Graduate Council
  • Curriculum Committee (University)
  • The faculty

The prospectus, if approved, should then be submitted to the President for consideration by the Board of Trustees. If the prospectus is approved, the process moves to Phase 2.

Phase 2 - New Graduate Program Curriculum Proposal

If the Board approves the new graduate program prospectus, then a complete curriculum proposal should be developed and submitted using the Proposal Form for new programs found on the University Curriculum Committee site. This includes:

  • A listing of the degree (s) offered and the associated degree requirements
  • A syllabus for each course that includes catalog number, title, description and semester hours credit
  • A statement regarding anticipated sequencing of course offerings for the program and staffing implications

The curriculum proposal should then be submitted to the same groups as in Phase 1 for approval in the order listed below:

  • Curriculum Committee (School or Division-Based) (Proposals involving more than one school or division should be reviewed by all relevant school-or-division-based curriculum committees)
  • Graduate Council
  • Curriculum Committee (University)
  • The faculty

If approved, the curriculum proposal should then be submitted to the President for consideration by the Board of Trustees.

Board of Trustees approval is the last requirement before implementation including, as appropriate, submission to SACSCOC.